DeepSeek Banned Across Nations: A Closer Look at Countries that Banned it and Why
By Mukesh Kumar
Updated on Feb 07, 2025 | 17 min read | 1.5k views
Share:
For working professionals
For fresh graduates
More
By Mukesh Kumar
Updated on Feb 07, 2025 | 17 min read | 1.5k views
Share:
Table of Contents
DeepSeek, a Chinese AI app, arrived with promises of powerful AI that competed with well-known names. In a matter of days, major governments like Australia, Italy, and India announced restrictions on its use. Some bans on DeepSeek target only government devices, while others – like in Italy – go further and block the tool entirely.
Ministries of Finance and Home Affairs in different countries have voiced serious worries about data security, unauthorized information access, and the possible exposure of sensitive information.
You’ll soon see why these bans created such a sensation. DeepSeek’s sudden success made it a headline maker, yet concerns about user privacy and government confidentiality sparked global scrutiny. Read on if you're curious about who banned DepSeek, why it matters, and what this means for emerging AI.
Governments around the world haven’t all reacted to banning DeepSeek the same way. Some have banned it entirely, while others have imposed partial bans.
Here's the full breakdown of countries that banned DeepSeek, alongside the scope of the ban — full or partial — when the ban was imposed, and the potential 'why'.
DeepSeek Banned Countries List |
Date & Scope |
What Prompted the Ban? |
Italy | Date: January 30, 2025 Scope: Full ban |
Lack of compliance with EU data protection laws. |
Taiwan | Date: February 3, 2025 Scope: Ban in all government agencies, public schools, state-owned enterprises, and critical infrastructure. |
Risk to national information security and possibility of data leaks to Chinese servers. |
India | Date: January 29, 2025 Scope: Ban on official/government devices by the Ministry of Finance (and extended to central government offices). |
Concerns over confidentiality of government data. |
Australia | Date: February 4, 2025 Scope: Complete ban on all federal government devices and systems, mandated by Home Affairs. |
Security agencies advised it poses an “unacceptable security risk” to national infrastructure. |
United States (Federal Agencies) | Date: Late January 2025 Scope: Multiple agency-level bans (to be discussed in a later section in detail) |
Risk of data being stored on or accessible by servers in China. |
Texas (US State Government) | Date: Late January 2025 Scope: Ban on all state government-issued devices. |
Fears the Chinese Communist Party could infiltrate critical infrastructure via data harvesting. |
South Korea | Date: February 6, 2025 Scope: Ban by defense ministry on military computers; additional restrictions across select ministries. |
Security concerns and questions about personal data handling. |
Canada | Date: January 28, 2025 Scope: Ban on federal government devices/networks overseen by Shared Services Canada. |
“Serious privacy concerns” over possible retention or sharing of sensitive data with Chinese authorities. |
Also Read: What is DeepSeek? Its Types, Impact on Nvidia, ChatGPT & Other Tech Players, and More
Some governments shared short memos, while others wrote formal notices explaining why they blocked DeepSeek. You'll see their exact words below and the specifics on whether they enacted total bans or limited them to certain devices.
“The Authority, considering the potential high risk for the data of millions of people in Italy, has asked the two companies and their affiliates to confirm which personal data are collected, from which sources, for which purposes, what is the legal basis of the processing, and whether they are stored on servers located in China” – A Press Note (translated from Italian from the TOI).
Italy’s Data Protection Authority, also known as the Garante, took one of the first and most decisive steps by ordering DeepSeek to block its AI services for Italian users. Officials said the startup’s response to questions about its data practices was “completely insufficient,” which led them to remove the app from local digital stores.
The regulator described possible breaches of EU privacy rules and demanded more transparency on how DeepSeek collects, stores, and processes information.
Italy’s ban goes beyond government networks and covers the general public as well. This means private citizens cannot access DeepSeek’s AI models within the country. The Garante emphasized user privacy and noted a lack of clarity over whether personal information might end up on servers in China.
“DeepSeek endangers national information security,” stated the Ministry of Digital Affairs (MODA).
The Taiwan government classified DeepSeek AI as a product that could expose sensitive data to Beijing. After highlighting potential privacy risks and unauthorized cross-border data transfers, officials decided to block the tool in public agencies. They argued that critical details might end up on servers outside Taiwan’s control.
Here’s a list of groups in Taiwan that can no longer use DeepSeek.
The ban does not extend to ordinary citizens, but leaders noted that data leakage could affect everyone if the platform remains unregulated.
Also Read: DeepSeek vs ChatGPT: What's The Difference and Which is Better
“It has been determined that AI tools and AI apps (such as ChatGPT, DeepSeek, etc.) in the office computers and devices pose risks for confidentiality of Govt. data and documents.” — Internal advisory by the Ministry of Finance.
India’s central government decided that DeepSeek could jeopardize sensitive information in official offices. The ban applies to government computers across different departments, and many employees were told that AI chatbots are not permitted for work-related tasks.
Authorities worry about the tool’s ability to store conversation logs, which might include confidential policy discussions or internal memos.
Here's a list of agencies that received formal warnings and instructions to avoid DeepSeek and any other AI apps that might share data externally.
Officials believe such technology could compromise national interests if unauthorized entities leaked or viewed sensitive records. However, the public is allowed to use DeepSeek.
Also Read: Data Security in Cloud Computing: Top 6 Factors To Consider
“After considering threat and risk analysis, I have determined that the use of DeepSeek products, applications and web services poses an unacceptable level of security risk to the Australian Government.” — Secretary of the Department of Home Affairs.
Australian authorities announced that DeepSeek is blocked on federal government computers and networks. The government referred to advice from intelligence experts who identified serious vulnerabilities with the AI tool.
They clarified that this decision was based on security factors rather than the app’s Chinese origin, although data confidentiality remains the main worry.
The restriction does not extend to private devices, but the government urged everyone to be cautious.
“We would like to bring to your attention a critical update regarding a new AI model called DeepSeek. It’s imperative that team members do not use DeepSeek’s AI for any work-related tasks or personal use.” — US Navy internal memo.
Multiple agencies in the United States moved to block DeepSeek on their official networks. The US Navy was among the first to warn personnel that any interaction with the app could expose government data to foreign servers.
Here’s a list of all federal departments and agencies that can no longer use DeepSeek.
These moves are not universal for every American, but federal teams view DeepSeek as a threat to information security. Officials say the app may retain user conversations and forward them to servers under Chinese jurisdiction, which raises serious concerns about unauthorized data collection.
“Texas will not allow the Chinese Communist Party to infiltrate our state’s critical infrastructure through data-harvesting AI and social media apps.” — Governor Greg Abbott.
Texas took quick action and banned DeepSeek on government-issued devices. This decision stemmed from concerns that the AI model might gather critical data and send it to servers in China. State officials said they refuse to risk any potential intrusion into vital systems, and the governor’s statement left no doubt about the seriousness of this move.
The ban applies only to government entities, so private individuals in Texas can still access the chatbot if they choose. However, the state’s leadership urged everyone to stay alert when using software that may share data with foreign partners.
“Blocking measures for DeepSeek have been implemented specifically for military work-related PCs with Internet.” — South Korea’s Defence Ministry (as told to AFP).
South Korea’s defense ministry barred DeepSeek from computers linked to military tasks, citing the possible exposure of personnel data and other sensitive information. The government also requested more details from DeepSeek about how it collects and stores user inputs.
Officials believe any app that routes information to foreign servers poses a risk, so they chose to shield parts of their armed forces first.
Private citizens can still run the app, but the government has signaled potential for stricter regulations if DeepSeek does not provide satisfactory details about how it handles personal data.
“Due to serious privacy concerns associated with the inappropriate collection and retention of sensitive personal information… it is recommended that departments and agencies restrict the use of the DeepSeek chatbot on government devices.” — Dominic Rochon, Chief Information Officer.
The federal government moved swiftly to shield official data from possible breaches. The directive orders departments to avoid using DeepSeek at work, though citizens remain free to use the AI on personal devices.
Officials worry that any information typed into DeepSeek could reside on servers in China. They believe foreign data regulations leave Canadians with limited control over how sensitive details might be accessed or stored.
You might wonder why so many governments immediately treated DeepSeek as a security risk. Officials and industry specialists have identified several core issues that set off alarms, ranging from national defense to data handling.
Below, you’ll find the main reasons behind those decisions, along with how each one ties back to DeepSeek’s activities.
Countries often worry about any platform that could expose military, political, or strategic information. When a tool connects to servers overseas, authorities fear that hostile groups or foreign agencies might intercept critical data. Security experts also caution that AI-driven services may gather information faster than older technologies ever could.
In DeepSeek’s case, agencies like the US Navy and Australia’s Department of Home Affairs flagged the possibility of classified details leaving official devices. They argued that even harmless user inputs might reveal sensitive topics if aggregated and analyzed. This worry led to swift bans on government networks in multiple regions.
Data privacy generally revolves around how personal or corporate details get collected, stored, and used. Many AI applications record user prompts, including private files, passwords, or business plans. If a chatbot stores that content indefinitely, it can become a significant liability.
DeepSeek drew attention because, according to its policy, it stores input data in China. Regulators in Italy and India stressed that government staff could accidentally expose internal documents, spurring bans and forcing the startup to explain how it processes everything people type into the chatbot.
Also Read: What is Cybersecurity? Definition, Types, Career, Job Roles & Salary
Global governments often worry that Chinese laws allow domestic authorities to require data sharing. Tech firms in China might have to hand over user information if asked, which raises red flags for other nations. Critics say this could pave the way for large-scale surveillance or intellectual property theft.
Many bans on DeepSeek cited the fear that data might not be truly private once it crosses Chinese borders. Regulators argued that anything stored on servers located in China could be accessed by officials there. Countries like Taiwan and Texas used this argument to justify blocking the app on state computers.
Various jurisdictions have strict rules about data residency, user consent, and how personal information is processed. Breaches can lead to fines, enforcement actions, or forced shutdowns. In the European Union, for example, organizations must follow stringent privacy standards.
DeepSeek ran into trouble with regulators in Italy, Ireland, and France, who demanded a detailed explanation of its compliance measures. Many felt the startup did not fully disclose where it kept user information or how long it retained it. The result was a legal standoff, with bans as the immediate outcome while investigations continued.
DeepSeek prompted a massive market reaction in January 2025 after it launched its R1 model on January 20, 2025. Its cost-effective approach (just USD 5.576 million for training the bot) and smaller chip usage rattled tech firms that spend far more to train AI models.
Some experts think DeepSeek bans may only temporarily slow the company's rise. For instance, Hyoun Park, Chief Analyst at Amalgam Insights (a research and advisory firm for new technologies), notes that DeepSeek could partner with local hosting providers in each region. He believes such steps might satisfy officials who worry about data leaving their borders.
In contrast, Anil Clifford, Founder of Eden Digital (a UK-based IT consulting firm), warns that bans from vital markets might choke DeepSeek’s growth. He sees long-term consequences if these restrictions stay in place.
There are two sides to DeepSeek's ban, too – let's explore both the positives and negatives.
Positive Outlook
Mounting Challenges
Infact, intellectual property disputes seem to be ratting DeepSeek.
Here’s a quick snapshot of how DeepSeek confessed OpenAI to be “the organization behind my development” when we asked the model this question: "Do you have any APIs I could use to have some software talk to you?”.
OpenAI and others have often accused DeepSeek of replicating or distilling their models' outputs, which could lead to legal battles and further damage the company's credibility, instigating more bans and lawsuits.
Whether DeepSeek can conquer these hurdles depends on how it addresses privacy, chip availability, and accusations of using rival material without proper agreements. If it adapts quickly — by forging partnerships and establishing clear data protocols — it might overcome short-term bans. Otherwise, these restrictions might stall its momentum and leave the field open to other AI contenders.
Also Read: Top 15+ Challenges of AI in 2025: Key Types, Strategies, Jobs & Trends
Many people see the DeepSeek ban as part of a wider shift in how governments handle AI technologies. TikTok, a Chinese-owned social platform, and Huawei, a major telecom firm, ran into similar hurdles over claims of potential data exploitation and ties to foreign authorities.
DeepSeek’s ban shows that AI solutions are now under a spotlight once reserved for social media apps and hardware vendors.
Let’s explore parallels with similar restrictions: some high-profile examples of similar bans:
DeepSeek’s crackdown illustrates how quickly authorities can clamp down on AI platforms that raise suspicion.
ChatGPT faced comparable hurdles in Italy and India, proving that no tool is immune to scrutiny once data privacy or national security questions come up. These steps hint that future AI products may be viewed more cautiously.
Below are a few possible outcomes for emerging applications.
These events tell you that AI makers must focus on privacy, transparency, and user protection if they want to avoid global backlash. Organizations and developers might turn to open-source approaches or region-specific hosting strategies in order to retain user trust and comply with fast-changing policies.
Also Read: The Future of DeepSeek: Predictions and Trends for 2025 and Beyond
Beijing spoke out soon after the first bans, criticizing the actions as misguided. Officials framed the restrictions as politically motivated and claimed they had no legal basis. Officials framed the restrictions as politically motivated and claimed they had no legal basis.
Below, you'll find the main positions outlined by China's foreign ministry and what their statements mean for the ongoing global debate over AI security.
“The Chinese government has never and will never require enterprises or individuals to illegally collect or store data” — Official Foreign Ministry Statement.
China’s representatives emphasize that foreign entities have misread its data policies.
They urged other governments to allow open competition rather than curtailing an AI startup’s access. Beijing warned that such moves could chill international cooperation in areas like cloud computing, code-sharing, and advanced research.
DeepSeek's rapid climb and the swift response from multiple governments show just how significant data security has become. Officials across different continents have sent a firm signal that any AI app — no matter how innovative — will face serious hurdles if it fails to address privacy and national security standards.
At the same time, DeepSeek’s approach still inspires some in the tech world who see potential in its low-cost, open-source methods. These bans might end up reshaping how you, and others, view AI adoption worldwide. Rather than marking the end of the AI boom, they hint at a new phase where regulations, trust, and transparency become top priorities.
Related Blogs:
Expand your expertise with the best resources available. Browse the programs below to find your ideal fit in Best Machine Learning and AI Courses Online.
Discover in-demand Machine Learning skills to expand your expertise. Explore the programs below to find the perfect fit for your goals.
Discover popular AI and ML blogs and free courses to deepen your expertise. Explore the programs below to find your perfect fit.
Reference Links:
https://www.sydney.edu.au/news-opinion/news/2025/02/06/australia-bans-deepseek-from-government-devices-experts-react.html
https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/federal-government-bans-chinese-ai-startup-deepseek-on-public-service-devices
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/which-countries-have-banned-chinese-ai-deepseek-india-us-south-korea-taiwan-italy/articleshow/117965057.cms
https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/international/global-trends/chinas-deepseek-ban-begins-in-usand-it-started-in-elon-musks-new-home-state/articleshow/117936250.cms?from=mdr
https://www.reuters.com/technology/artificial-intelligence/south-koreas-industry-ministry-temporarily-bans-access-deepseek-security-2025-02-05/
https://www.reuters.com/technology/taiwan-bans-government-departments-using-deepseek-ai-2025-02-03/
Get Free Consultation
By submitting, I accept the T&C and
Privacy Policy
Top Resources