Time and Space Complexity in Machine Learning Algorithms Explained

Time and space complexity are fundamental concepts that determine the efficiency of machine learning algorithms. Time complexity refers to the duration an algorithm takes to execute, while space complexity measures the memory it uses. These factors directly impact the scalability and performance of models, especially with large datasets.

In real-time applications, such as fraud detection and search engines, managing time and space complexity is crucial for ensuring fast and efficient performance. Tools like Python libraries (NumPy) and frameworks (TensorFlow) help in optimizing these aspects.

In this blog, you will learn how time and space complexity shape ML processes and the techniques used to manage them.

Ready to take your algorithm analysis skills to the next level? Enroll in upGrad's Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning - AI ML Courses to gain hands-on experience in NLP, deep learning, neural networks, and more. Get job-ready today!

Time and Space Complexity: Key to ML Model Efficiency

Time and space complexity are crucial for optimizing ML models in production. Time complexity is the amount of time an algorithm takes as input size increases, while space complexity is the memory it uses. Models like CNNs often have high time complexity, causing delays in real-time systems such as autonomous vehicles or video streaming.

Managing space complexity through techniques like quantization and pruning reduces model size, enabling deployment on edge devices like smartphones and IoT devices, ensuring fast inference for tasks like real-time object detection and speech recognition.

Looking to strengthen your understanding of time complexity and algorithm design? The following upGrad expert-led programs will help you build a strong foundation in algorithms while enhancing your skills in AI and scalable system design:

• Executive Diploma in Machine Learning and AI with IIIT-B
• Master’s Degree in Artificial Intelligence and Data Science
• Generative AI Mastery Certificate for Software Development

Let's now explore the concept of time complexity and understand how it directly influences the performance of ML algorithms.

Time Complexity in Machine Learning: Key Types and Impact

Time complexity measures how an algorithm's execution time increases as the input size grows, which is crucial in machine learning for understanding model behavior with larger datasets. It’s expressed in Big O notation, with common complexities like O(n), O(n^2), and O(log n), indicating the rate at which time increases relative to input size. Big O captures the upper bound of an algorithm’s running time. It helps developers understand the worst-case behavior of an algorithm.

Here are a few commonly encountered types of time complexity:

1. Constant Time - O(1)
An algorithm has constant time complexity if its execution time remains the same regardless of the input size. These are the most efficient operations, typically involving direct access.

Sample Code:

int getFirstElement(int[] arr) {
    return arr[0];
}

Explanation: Accessing an array element by index is a single operation and takes the same time regardless of how large the array is. Hence, the function always completes in O(1) time.

2. Logarithmic Time - O(log n)
Logarithmic time complexity means the algorithm reduces the input size by a constant factor (commonly 1/2) at each step. This often occurs in divide-and-conquer strategies.

Sample Code:

int binarySearch(int[] arr, int target) {
    int low = 0, high = arr.length - 1;
    while (low <= high) {
        int mid = (low + high) / 2;
        if (arr[mid] == target) return mid;
        else if (arr[mid] < target) low = mid + 1;
        else high = mid - 1;
    }
    return -1;
}

Explanation: At each iteration, the search space is halved. This gives us a logarithmic number of iterations, making binary search highly efficient on large sorted arrays.

3. Linear Time - O(n)
Linear time complexity indicates that the execution time grows in direct proportion to the input size. Every element is visited once, without nesting.

Sample Code:

int sum(int[] arr) {
    int total = 0;
    for (int i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) {
        total += arr[i];
    }
    return total;
}

Explanation: The loop runs once for each of the n elements, performing a constant-time addition at each step. Therefore, the total time is proportional to n.

4. Linearithmic Time - O(n log n)
An algorithm is O(n log n) if it performs a logarithmic number of operations on each of n elements. This complexity arises in efficient sorting techniques like Merge Sort and Heap Sort.

Sample Code:

void mergeSort(int[] arr, int left, int right) {
    if (left < right) {
        int mid = (left + right) / 2;
        mergeSort(arr, left, mid);
        mergeSort(arr, mid + 1, right);
        merge(arr, left, mid, right);
    }
}

Explanation: Merge sort splits the array recursively (log n levels) and merges each half in linear time. Thus, the overall time complexity becomes O(n log n).

5. Quadratic Time - O(n²)
Quadratic time algorithms have two nested loops, where the number of operations is proportional to the square of the input size. They are inefficient for large inputs.

Sample Code:

void bubbleSort(int[] arr) {
    for (int i = 0; i < arr.length - 1; i++) {
        for (int j = 0; j < arr.length - i - 1; j++) {
            if (arr[j] > arr[j + 1]) {
                int temp = arr[j];
                arr[j] = arr[j + 1];
                arr[j + 1] = temp;
            }
        }
    }
}

Explanation: Each element is compared with every other element in nested loops. For n elements, this results in about n * (n-1) comparisons, hence O(n²) time.

6. Cubic Time - O(n³)
Cubic time complexity arises when three nested loops are used, typically for algorithms involving 3D matrices or triplet evaluations. Time grows very quickly with input size.

Sample Code:

void checkTriplets(int[] arr) {
    for (int i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) {
        for (int j = 0; j < arr.length; j++) {
            for (int k = 0; k < arr.length; k++) {
                // Perform some operation on arr[i], arr[j], arr[k]
            }
        }
    }
}

Explanation: Three levels of nesting mean every combination of three elements is evaluated. For input size n, this leads to n × n × n = n³ operations.

7. Exponential Time - O(2ⁿ)
Exponential time complexity means the algorithm's execution time doubles with each additional input element. It is often the result of recursive branching without pruning.

Sample Code:

int fibonacci(int n) {
    if (n <= 1) return n;
    return fibonacci(n - 1) + fibonacci(n - 2);
}

Explanation: Each call spawns two more recursive calls, resulting in a binary tree of depth n. The total number of calls grows as 2ⁿ, making it impractical for large n.

8. Factorial Time - O(n!)
Algorithms with factorial complexity evaluate all permutations of the input. The number of operations grows as the product of all integers up to n, making it the least efficient.

Sample Code:

void generatePermutations(List<Integer> path, boolean[] used) {
    if (path.size() == n) {
        // process path
        return;
    }
    for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
        if (!used[i]) {
            used[i] = true;
            path.add(i);
            generatePermutations(path, used);
            path.remove(path.size() - 1);
            used[i] = false;
        }
    }
}

Explanation: All possible permutations (n!) are generated via recursion and backtracking. For n = 10, it evaluates 3.6 million paths—scaling rapidly beyond practical limits.

Here’s a quick comparative overview of how different time complexity scales with increasing input size. This table helps visualize the dramatic differences in performance across algorithms.

Let’s now explore how space complexity and its types affect machine learning models, particularly when handling complex datasets on devices with limited resources.

Also Read: Introduction to Linear Search Algorithm: Time Complexity and Examples for 2025

Space Complexity in Machine Learning: Key Types and Impact

Space complexity measures the memory an algorithm uses relative to input size, including input storage and auxiliary space. It is key for optimizing algorithms, especially with large datasets or on resource-constrained devices. Efficient space usage, like pruning and in-place algorithms, ensures scalability.

Here are a few commonly encountered types of space complexity:

1. Constant Space - O(1)
An algorithm has constant space complexity if it requires the same amount of memory, regardless of the input size. These are the most efficient in terms of memory usage.

Sample Code:

int getFirstElement(int[] arr) {
    return arr[0];
}

Explanation: Accessing an array element requires constant space, regardless of how large the array is. The function uses only a fixed amount of memory (for the array index) regardless of the input size.

2. Logarithmic Space - O(log n)
Logarithmic space complexity occurs when the memory usage grows in proportion to the logarithm of the input size. This typically happens with recursive algorithms where the depth of recursion is proportional to the log of the input size.

Sample Code:

void binaryTreeTraversal(TreeNode root) {
    if (root == null) return;
    binaryTreeTraversal(root.left);
    binaryTreeTraversal(root.right);
}

Explanation: In a binary tree traversal, the space complexity is O(log n) due to the call stack’s depth during recursion.

3. Linear Space - O(n)
Linear space complexity indicates that the memory usage grows in direct proportion to the size of the input. This is common in algorithms that require storing a collection of input data or intermediate results.

Sample Code:

int[] copyArray(int[] arr) {
    int[] copy = new int[arr.length];
    for (int i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) {
        copy[i] = arr[i];
    }
    return copy;
}

Explanation: The algorithm creates a new array of the same size as the input, thus requiring linear space, proportional to the size of the input array.

4. Linearithmic Space - O(n log n)
This complexity arises in algorithms where memory usage grows in relation to the input size, multiplied by a logarithmic factor. An example is some efficient sorting algorithms with additional memory usage for dividing and merging data.

Sample Code:

void mergeSort(int[] arr) {
    if (arr.length <= 1) return;
    int mid = arr.length / 2;
    int[] left = Arrays.copyOfRange(arr, 0, mid);
    int[] right = Arrays.copyOfRange(arr, mid, arr.length);
    mergeSort(left);
    mergeSort(right);
    merge(arr, left, right);
}

Explanation: Merge Sort requires O(n log n) space because, while sorting, it recursively creates sub-arrays that store portions of the original array.

5. Quadratic Space - O(n²)
Quadratic space complexity occurs when an algorithm uses memory proportional to the square of the input size. This is common in algorithms involving nested data structures, such as matrices or graphs.

Sample Code:

int[][] generateMatrix(int n) {
    int[][] matrix = new int[n][n];
    for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
        for (int j = 0; j < n; j++) {
            matrix[i][j] = i + j;
        }
    }
    return matrix;
}

Explanation: The algorithm creates a matrix of size n², requiring O(n²) space to store all the elements.

6. Exponential Space - O(2ⁿ)
Exponential space complexity means that the amount of memory required doubles with each additional input element. This occurs in algorithms that branch recursively without pruning.

Sample Code:

void generateCombinations(String str, String prefix) {
    if (str.length() == 0) {
        System.out.println(prefix);
        return;
    }
    generateCombinations(str.substring(1), prefix + str.charAt(0));
    generateCombinations(str.substring(1), prefix);
}

Explanation: This recursive function generates all possible combinations of a string, leading to exponential growth in the number of function calls and memory usage (2ⁿ).

7. Factorial Space - O(n!)
Factorial space complexity arises when an algorithm evaluates all permutations of an input. This complexity grows extremely fast as the input size increases, making the algorithm impractical for large inputs.

Sample Code:

void generatePermutations(List<Integer> list, List<Integer> path) {
    if (path.size() == list.size()) {
        System.out.println(path);
        return;
    }
    for (int i = 0; i < list.size(); i++) {
        if (!path.contains(list.get(i))) {
            path.add(list.get(i));
            generatePermutations(list, path);
            path.remove(path.size() - 1);
        }
    }
}

Explanation: Generating all permutations of n elements involves a factorial number of possibilities, requiring O(n!) space.

Here’s the table that provides a clear comparison of how memory usage varies across algorithms with different space complexities.

Ready to lead the cloud revolution and elevate your career? Enroll in upGrad’s Professional Certificate Program in Cloud Computing and DevOps Course to gain hands-on experience with AWS, Azure, and GCP. Enroll now!

Also Read: Top 10 Cloud Computing Online Courses & Certifications [For Students & Working Professionals]

Here’s a table comparing time complexity and space complexity with a focus on their impact on algorithm performance. This comparison highlights how each affects the efficiency, speed, and memory usage of algorithms in various scenarios.

Also Read: Feature Engineering for Machine Learning: Process, Techniques, and Examples

Let’s now break down the step-by-step process to calculate time complexity, so you can evaluate algorithm efficiency with confidence.

How To Calculate Time Complexity? Step-by-Step Process

Understanding time complexity is essential for analyzing the scalability of algorithms. It tells you how many basic operations your code performs as input size increases, without depending on hardware, language, or compiler.

Here’s a systematic approach to calculating time complexity with precision:

Step 1: Identify the Input Size Variable(s)
Time complexity is measured relative to input size, usually denoted as n. For multi-dimensional inputs or composite structures, use variables that reflect all relevant dimensions.

Example:

• For an array arr[] with n elements → input size is n
• For a matrix matrix[n][m] → input size is n × m
• For a graph → use V (vertices) and E (edges)
• For a list of n strings each of length m → input size is typically n × m

Always choose variables that reflect the actual volume of data your algorithm processes.

Step 2: Find the Dominant Operation
The dominant operation is the one that scales most with input size, typically found inside the deepest loop or recursive call. It's the key driver of the algorithm's total running time.

Examples:

• Arithmetic: sum += arr[i]
• Comparisons: if (arr[i] == target)
• Function calls: mergeSort(arr, low, high) (analyze its internal cost if it's non-trivial)

Also consider conditional logic within loops (e.g., if, switch), as it can influence how many times certain operations execute. Additionally, pay attention to recursive calls and their call stack depth, especially in cases of unbalanced or exponential recursion.

Step 3: Count the Frequency of Execution
Once you've identified the dominant operation(s), determine how many times they execute in relation to the input size. This is the core of time complexity calculation. Let’s analyze how loop variables change with each iteration.

Sample Code 1: Single loop

for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
    sum += arr[i];
}

Explanation: Executes n times → Time Complexity: O(n)

Sample Code 2: Nested loop

for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
    for (int j = 0; j < n; j++) {
        sum += arr[i] * arr[j];
    }
}

Explanation: Outer loop runs n times, inner loop runs n times per outer iteration → O(n²)

Sample Code 3: For Loops with Halving/Growth

for (int i = 1; i < n; i *= 2) {
    // Executes while i <= n, doubling each time
}

Explanation: Runs log₂(n) times → Time Complexity: O(log n)

Step 4: For Recursive Functions, Use Recurrence Relations
When an algorithm uses recursion, define a recurrence relation that expresses how the problem breaks down into smaller subproblems and the cost to combine results.

Sample Code 1: Merge Sort

T(n) = 2T(n/2) + O(n)

Explanation:

• Splits input into two halves → 2 subproblems of size n/2 → 2T(n/2)
• Merging step takes linear time → O(n)
• Solve using Master Theorem or recursion tree: T(n) = O(n log n)

Sample Code 2: Naive Fibonacci

int fib(n) {
    if (n <= 1) return n;
    return fib(n-1) + fib(n-2);
}

Explanation:

• Two recursive calls per invocation
• No overlapping subproblem caching → leads to exponential growth
  T(n) = T(n-1) + T(n-2) ⇒ Time Complexity: O(2ⁿ)

Use solving methods like the Master Theorem, recursion trees, or substitution to compute closed-form time complexity.

Step 5: Simplify the Expression
Once you've derived the runtime expression from loops or recursion, keep only the dominant term, the one that grows the fastest as input size (n) increases.

• Discard constant terms (e.g., +10)
• Ignore slower-growing terms (e.g., linear when quadratic is present)
• Drop constant coefficients (e.g., 5 in 5n²)
• Keep only the highest-order term to express time complexity

Example: T(n) = 5n² + 3n + 10 → O(n²)

Where,

• 5n² → This term grows the fastest as n increases. For large n, this dominates the total execution time.
• 3n → This is a linear term. It grows slower than n², so it becomes insignificant as n gets large.
• 10 → A constant-time operation. No matter how big n gets, this doesn’t scale, so it's ignored in asymptotic analysis.

Final Time Complexity is O(n²). We retain only the n² term and discard constants and lower-order terms because Big O describes the algorithm’s growth rate, not the exact number of operations.

Step 6: Consider Worst, Best, and Average Case (If Applicable)
Time complexity can vary depending on the input. It’s important to analyze all relevant cases, especially in algorithms where performance depends on input arrangement.

Example: Linear Search → Searching for an element in an unsorted array of n elements:

• Worst Case: Element not present → O(n)
• Best Case: Element is at index 0 → O(1)
• Average Case: Element is somewhere in the middle → O(n)

For most engineering and interview scenarios, worst-case time complexity is emphasized because it guarantees performance boundaries.

Curious how to predict probabilities for binary outcomes with the algorithm? Join upGrad's Logistic Regression for Beginners Course and explore the fundamentals of algorithms in this 17-hour course. Get started today!

Also Read: Understanding Decision Tree In AI: Types, Examples, and How to Create One

Let's now explore a systematic approach to calculating space complexity, which helps us analyze how much memory an algorithm uses as the input size increases. 

How To Calculate Space Complexity? Step-by-Step Process

Understanding space complexity is vital for analyzing the memory usage of algorithms. It tells you how much memory your algorithm uses as the input size increases, irrespective of hardware, programming language, or compiler.

Here’s a systematic approach to calculating space complexity with precision:

Step 1: Identify the Input Size Variable(s)
Just like time complexity, space complexity is measured relative to the input size, typically denoted by n. For more complex structures, use appropriate variables reflecting all dimensions.

Example:

• For an array arr[] with n elements → input size is n.
• For a matrix matrix[n][m] → input size is n × m.
• For a graph → use V (vertices) and E (edges).
• For a list of n strings each of length m → input size is typically n × m.

Choose variables that best represent the actual size of data the algorithm processes.

Step 2: Break Down the Variables and Data Structures
The space complexity is influenced by both static and dynamic memory usage. Carefully evaluate the variables and data structures your algorithm uses.

Example:

• An array arr[] with n elements → takes O(n) space.
• A matrix matrix[n][m] → takes O(n * m) space.
• A hash map with n entries → takes O(n) space.

Sample Code for an Array:

arr = [1] * n  # Space: O(n)

Explanation:

• This line creates an array arr of size n, where each element is initialized to 1.
• Since the array contains n elements, the space complexity is O(n). The array's size depends on n, so the space used grows linearly with the value of n.

Sample Code for a Matrix:

matrix = [[0] * m for _ in range(n)]  # Space: O(n * m)

Explanation:

• This line creates a matrix with n rows and m columns. Each element in the matrix is initialized to 0. The outer list comprehension runs n times, creating a row of m elements (all zeros) in each iteration.
• The matrix consists of n rows and m columns, so the total number of elements is n * m. Hence, the space complexity is O(n * m), which means the memory used scales with both n (number of rows) and m (number of columns).

Step 3: Consider Static and Dynamic Space Usage
Space complexity can be divided into static and dynamic components. Understanding the distinction between these two types of space usage is important when analyzing the overall space complexity of an algorithm.

1. Static space: Memory used by fixed-size variables or structures that do not change with the input size.

• Example: Variables such as integers, booleans, and pointers typically consume constant space. Also, if you have a fixed-size array (e.g., arr[10]), the space required will be constant, regardless of the input size.
• Space Complexity Impact: Static space does not impact the overall space complexity significantly, as its size is independent of the input size.

Sample Code:

a = 5  # integer (constant space)
b = True  # boolean (constant space)
arr = [1] * 10  # fixed-size array (constant space)

Explanation: In this example, the space complexity for a, b, and arr is O(1), as their sizes do not change with the input size.

2. Dynamic space: Dynamic space refers to memory that is allocated for structures whose size grows or shrinks based on the input size. This includes data structures like arrays, lists, stacks, queues, and linked lists, as well as memory used by recursive function calls.

• Example:
  • A dynamic array or list grows as elements are added.
  • Linked lists increase in size as nodes are added.
  • Recursive function calls use dynamic space in the function call stack, growing as the recursion depth increases.
• Space Complexity Impact: Dynamic space usage directly impacts the space complexity, as the amount of memory allocated depends on the input size.

Sample Code:

arr = [1] * n  # Dynamic array (grows with n, space complexity O(n))
linked_list = None
for i in range(n):
    linked_list = add_to_linked_list(linked_list, i)  # Each new node increases space

Explanation:

• The dynamic array arr has space complexity of O(n), because the array grows with the input size n.
• The linked list grows as nodes are added, so its space complexity is also O(n), as it stores n elements.

Step 4: Account for Function Call Stack in Recursion (If Applicable)
In recursive algorithms, the space complexity is influenced by the depth of recursion, which results in memory being used by the call stack.

Example:

• In a recursive function like binary search, the depth of recursion is logarithmic, so space complexity is O(log n).
• In an algorithm like merge sort, which involves splitting the problem in half at each recursive step, the space complexity is O(n) due to the storage of auxiliary arrays.

When calculating the space for recursion, consider how many times the function calls itself and the maximum depth of recursion.

Step 5: Analyze the Dominant Space Contributor
When analyzing the space complexity of an algorithm, the goal is to identify which data structure or variable contributes most to the total memory usage as the input size (n) grows. The space complexity is dominated by the component that requires the most space.

Example: If an algorithm uses -

• An array of size n: This requires O(n) space, as it contains n elements.
• A matrix of size n × n: This requires O(n²) space, as it contains n * n elements.

Space Complexity: The total space complexity is determined by the largest space contributor. In this case, the matrix (n × n) has a larger space requirement than the array (n), so the dominant term is O(n²).

Thus, the overall space complexity is O(n²) because the matrix grows faster with increasing n than the array.

Sample Code:

arr = [1] * n  # Space complexity: O(n)
matrix = [[0] * n for _ in range(n)]  # Space complexity: O(n^2)

Explanation: 

• Array arr: Space complexity O(n) (since it has n elements).
• Matrix matrix: Space complexity O(n²) (since it has n × n elements).

When combined, the space complexity is O(n²) because O(n²) dominates O(n).

Step 6: Simplify the Expression
After analyzing the space complexity and identifying the relevant terms, the next step is to simplify the expression to reflect the largest contributing factor. This helps in understanding the algorithm’s behavior as the input size grows, making it easier to evaluate its efficiency.

• Ignore constant factors: If the space complexity is O(2n), it simplifies to O(n) because constants do not affect growth as the input size increases.
• Discard lower-order terms: If the space complexity is O(n + n²), it simplifies to O(n²) because the quadratic term grows faster than the linear term as n increases.

Always represent the space complexity by the term that grows most rapidly with the input size.

Sample Code:

arr = [1] * n           # Space complexity: O(n)
matrix = [[0] * n for _ in range(n)]  # Space complexity: O(n²)

Explanation: The array (arr) has space complexity O(n). The matrix (matrix) has space complexity O(n²).

• Combined Space Complexity: The total space complexity would be O(n + n²). However, since n² grows faster than n, we discard the n term.
• Simplified Expression: O(n + n²) simplifies to O(n²) because the quadratic term n² dominates as n increases.
• Final Result: The overall space complexity is O(n²).

Step 7: Consider Worst, Best, and Average Case Space Complexity (If Applicable)
Space complexity, like time complexity, can vary based on the input. While this is less commonly discussed than time complexity, it's important to consider all scenarios for space usage:

Step 8: Final Space Complexity
After completing the above steps, express the final space complexity in Big O notation. This gives you a clear understanding of how the algorithm’s memory consumption scales as the input size increases.

Example:  If your algorithm uses an array of size n, a linked list with n elements and a function call stack that grows logarithmically (O(log n)). The total space complexity will be:

Since the dominant term is O(n), the overall space complexity is O(n).

By following these steps, you can systematically calculate the space complexity of any algorithm. This method ensures that you can efficiently evaluate the memory usage of an algorithm, which is just as crucial for large-scale systems as understanding its time complexity.

Also Read: What Are the Characteristics of an Algorithm? Definition, Features, and Examples

Let’s now explore some practical use cases where time and space complexity directly impact system efficiency, scalability, and performance across different domains.

Practical Use Cases of Time and Space Complexity

Time and space complexity are critical metrics for evaluating an algorithm’s performance. They directly influence scalability, latency, throughput, and memory utilization, especially when dealing with large-scale systems or embedded environments.

Here’s a breakdown of practical use cases where time and space complexities play a crucial role in optimizing and scaling algorithms:

1. Web Applications and APIs
Optimizing search operations and data retrieval in web applications can drastically reduce load times and improve user satisfaction. For APIs that handle large amounts of data, implementing efficient indexing and caching mechanisms like hash maps or LRU caches ensures that response times remain consistent, even as the dataset grows.

Time Complexity - Optimized Search Algorithms:

• Binary Search: Instead of searching an array or list sequentially (O(n)), we use binary search for sorted data. This algorithm works in O(log n) time by halving the search space with each comparison.
• Hashing: For lookups, hash maps provide O(1) average time complexity. This can drastically improve search and retrieval times in API queries.
• Example Optimization: When using pagination in an API to handle large datasets, optimal search algorithms like binary search or hashing can retrieve only the needed portion of data, reducing the overall time complexity per request.

Space Complexity - Caching with Hash Maps or LRU Cache:

When implementing caching, space complexity depends on the cache size:

• LRU Cache (Least Recently Used): This is an efficient way to manage cache with O(n) space complexity where n is the maximum cache size, and allows O(1) time complexity for accessing cache items.
• Distributed Caching: In scenarios like Redis or Memcached, data is stored across multiple servers, which requires careful space management to avoid data duplication and excessive memory usage.

Optimizing space usage by evicting old or rarely used data can be critical when system resources are limited.

Also Read: What is Hashing in Data Structure? Explore Hashing Techniques, Benefits, Limitations, and More

2. Machine Learning and Deep Learning Algorithms
Efficient algorithm design in machine learning requires analyzing time and space complexity to scale across large datasets and deep models. Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) reduces training time by updating parameters incrementally, avoiding costly matrix operations. Batch processing optimizes memory usage by limiting the number of samples processed at once.

Time Complexity - Training Time for Algorithms

• Linear Regression: The time complexity of fitting a linear regression model depends on the number of data points (n) and features (p). The standard algorithm has a complexity of O(p²) (for calculating coefficients using matrix operations), but more efficient methods like SGD run in O(n * p).
• Deep Learning (Neural Networks): Training deep networks, especially for backpropagation, involves iterating through data multiple times (epochs). The time complexity can be represented as O(n * p * k), where k is the number of layers, n is the number of data points, and p is the number of features per data point.
  • Optimization: Modern frameworks like TensorFlow or PyTorch use GPU acceleration to optimize training time, lowering the effective time complexity in practice.

Space Complexity - Storing Models
Neural network space complexity is determined by the number of layers, neurons, and weights. For a fully connected network, it is typically O(n × p), where n is the number of layers and p is the number of neurons per layer.

• Example: In Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), additional memory is required for storing intermediate feature maps during forward and backward propagation. This adds O(n × w × h × c) space complexity, where n is the batch size, w and h are image dimensions, and c is the number of channels.

3. Sorting Algorithms
For large datasets, choosing the right sorting algorithm is essential for performance. MergeSort guarantees O(n log n) time complexity but requires extra memory, while QuickSort provides in-place sorting with O(log n) space complexity, making it more memory-efficient for applications where space is a critical resource.

Time Complexity - Merge Sort vs QuickSort

• Merge Sort: The O(n log n) time complexity is derived from recursively splitting the array in half and merging sorted subarrays. Despite its O(n log n) time complexity, it requires extra space for the auxiliary array, making its space complexity O(n).
• QuickSort: QuickSort also has a worst-case time complexity of O(n²) with poor pivot selection, but its average-case complexity is O(n log n). It uses in-place partitioning, resulting in O(log n) space complexity due to recursion stack usage.

Hybrid Algorithms: Some modern implementations, like IntroSort, begin with QuickSort and switch to HeapSort when recursion depth exceeds a certain threshold, providing both efficient time complexity and space usage.

Space Complexity - HeapSort
Heap sort is an in-place sorting algorithm with O(1) space complexity. It organizes data using a binary heap, and as such, it does not require additional memory for auxiliary data structures. However, its time complexity is O(n log n), which is not as fast as QuickSort in practice.

4. Pathfinding Algorithms in Games
In gaming applications, algorithms like A* allow characters to find the shortest path while balancing computation time. The algorithm’s space complexity can be optimized by managing the open and closed lists efficiently, ensuring smoother performance in complex, dynamic environments with multiple agents or players.

Time Complexity:

• A* Algorithm: A* Algorithm combines Dijkstra’s algorithm with a heuristic to guide search toward the goal. Its time complexity is O(E log V), where E is the number of edges and V the number of vertices. A well-designed heuristic reduces the number of explored nodes, improving practical performance.
• Dijkstra’s Algorithm: If no heuristic is used, Dijkstra’s algorithm has a time complexity of O(V²) using an adjacency matrix or O(E + V log V) using an adjacency list with a priority queue.

Space Complexity: A Memory Usage

• O(V) space is required to store the open and closed lists (which keep track of explored and unexplored nodes). Each node needs to store its position, cost, and parent node for path reconstruction.
• If using an additional grid representation for maps or larger graphs, space complexity can grow significantly.

5. Mobile App Development
Mobile apps need algorithms that not only perform well but also consume minimal memory. For image processing tasks, Gaussian Blur can be optimized by reducing the resolution before processing, helping balance the need for real-time processing with limited memory available on mobile devices.

Time Complexity - Image Processing Algorithms

• Gaussian Blur: A common image processing technique with O(n * m) time complexity, where n and m are the image’s width and height.
• CNNs in Mobile Apps: CNN-based processing on mobile devices requires efficient implementations to achieve O(n log n) time complexity, particularly for real-time tasks like object recognition or image segmentation. Mobile frameworks often rely on GPU acceleration to manage the heavy computational load.

Space Complexity - Memory Optimization in Mobile Apps

• Lazy Loading: A technique used to reduce memory consumption by only loading images or data when they are needed. The space complexity remains O(1) for image storage, but additional memory may be used for managing cache.
• Compression: Algorithms like JPEG for images or H.264 for videos reduce the space complexity of media files, saving device storage without sacrificing much quality.

Practically, algorithms are not used in isolation, they power entire solutions across domains like AI , finance, healthcare, and cyber security. Time and space complexity determine the feasibility, responsiveness, and scalability of solutions, ensuring they handle growing data volumes and deliver efficient, real-time results.

Also Read: A Guide to the Types of AI Algorithms and Their Applications

Let’s now explore some specific best practices for optimizing time and space complexity to ensure efficient performance and resource management in your systems.

Best Practices When Considering Time and Space Complexity

Optimizing time and space complexity is vital for building scalable systems. By choosing efficient algorithms, using the right data structures, and leveraging techniques like memoization, in-place algorithms, and external memory, you can enhance performance and minimize resource usage as data scales.

Below are some best practices for improving time and space complexity:

1. Optimize Recursion with Iterative Solutions or Tail Recursion
Recursion can lead to high space usage due to the call stack, especially when the depth is large. For instance, in problems like tree traversal, a depth-first search (DFS) can result in O(n) space complexity, where n is the height of the tree.

Optimization can be done with following:

• Tail Recursion: Use tail recursion where the recursive call is the last operation in the function. Modern compilers optimize tail recursion, converting it into a loop and reducing the call stack depth.
• Iterative Conversion: If recursion depth can be significant (e.g., parsing large input files or deep tree structures), convert the recursion into an iterative solution using a stack or queue. For example, DFS can be done using an explicit stack instead of relying on the system's call stack, reducing space complexity from O(n) to O(log n) in balanced tree scenarios.

Example: A DFS on a binary tree could be converted to an iterative approach using a stack, which prevents stack overflow on large trees.

2. Choose Space-Efficient Data Structures
The choice of data structure greatly affects both time and space complexity. Instead of generic structures, use more space-efficient or time-efficient alternatives based on your specific needs.

• Trie (Prefix Tree): When working with large sets of strings or when needing fast prefix searches, a Trie can provide O(m) time complexity for lookups, where m is the length of the string. Although it uses O(n × m) space for n strings of average length m, and is more efficient for prefix searches than hash maps or binary search trees.
• Bloom Filter: A Bloom Filter performs set membership checks in O(k) time, where k is the number of hash functions, and uses O(n) space. It allows false positives but no false negatives, making it efficient for large-scale membership tests, such as duplicate URL detection in web crawlers.

Example: Implementing a Trie for an autocomplete system reduces both lookup time and space over using a generic hash map.

3. Use External Memory Algorithms for Large Data
When data exceeds the available memory (RAM), external memory algorithms are crucial for processing. These algorithms are designed to process data that doesn’t fit into main memory and use disk I/O efficiently.

• External Merge Sort: When sorting massive datasets (e.g., large logs or database exports), External Merge Sort reads data in chunks from disk, sorts each chunk in memory, and merges them. This reduces memory consumption while efficiently handling O(n log n) sorting for datasets larger than available memory.
• MapReduce (Hadoop/Spark): For distributed data processing, MapReduce (in frameworks like Hadoop or Spark) breaks tasks into parallelizable units across multiple machines, improving both time and space complexity in big data environments.
• Streaming Algorithms: For real-time data processing, Count-Min Sketch and HyperLogLog approximate element counts or cardinality with sublinear space complexity (O(log n) or O(1)), allowing efficient data stream analysis without storing the entire dataset.

Example: External Merge Sort for sorting a billion records that don't fit into memory, or using HyperLogLog for approximating the count of unique users in real-time analytics.

4. Use Divide and Conquer to Optimize Complexity
This technique reduces the problem into smaller, more manageable subproblems, which are solved independently and then combined. This approach often leads to substantial reductions in both time and space complexity.

• QuickSort: Instead of sorting the entire array in a linear fashion (O(n²)), QuickSort divides the dataset into smaller partitions, achieving O(n log n) time complexity with O(log n) space complexity due to in-place partitioning.
• Matrix Multiplication: Algorithms like Strassen's Algorithm reduce matrix multiplication time complexity from O(n³) (naive approach) to O(n².81). Although the space complexity is O(n²), the reduction in computation time can be critical for large matrix operations in scientific computing or machine learning.

Example: For sorting, QuickSort optimizes both time and space complexity by dividing the dataset and sorting recursively, minimizing memory usage compared to MergeSort.

5. Minimize Memory Usage with In-Place Algorithms
Minimizing additional space usage by modifying data structures in place is one of the most efficient ways to handle space complexity. In-place algorithms don’t require additional memory beyond the input data structure.

• In-place QuickSort: Unlike MergeSort, which requires O(n) space for auxiliary arrays, QuickSort sorts in place with O(log n) space complexity (due to recursion), making it ideal for memory-constrained environments like embedded systems or low-memory applications.
• Memory Pools: In applications with frequent memory allocations (e.g., game engines, real-time simulations), memory pools allocate large memory blocks upfront and hand out smaller chunks as needed. This approach minimizes fragmentation and reduces memory overhead, enhancing performance.

Example: Using in-place QuickSort for sorting data in memory or implementing a memory pool in a game engine to manage object creation and destruction efficiently, minimizing overhead and fragmentation.

Ready to enhance your skills in Algorithms? Enroll in 50 hours of expert-led learning with upGrad’s Data Structures & Algorithms Course, covering Algorithms, Blockchain, and Arrays. Join now to advance your career and earn a certification!

Also Read: How to Make an API Call in Angular? Create, Read, Update, and Delete Seamlessly

Enhance Your Algorithm Learning Journey with upGrad!

Time and space complexity is crucial as it determines how efficiently an algorithm performs as the input size grows. It's not just about getting the correct answer, it’s about achieving it quickly, reliably, and at scale. In systems like e-commerce platforms or real-time search engines, neglecting time and space complexity can lead to slow performance, lagging systems, and frustrated users.

To develop these concepts and enhance your problem-solving skills, structured learning can make a significant difference. upGrad offers industry-aligned courses and hands-on projects that help you grow from basic algorithm logic to advanced techniques.

Here are some additional upGrad courses to help you get started:

• Introduction to Data Analysis using Excel
• Advanced Generative AI Certification Course
• Learn Python Libraries: NumPy, Matplotlib & Pandas
• Linear Regression - Step by Step Guide
• Linear Algebra for Analysis

Unsure which course is right for building a strong foundation in time complexity and algorithms? Get personalized guidance from upGrad’s expert counselors or visit your nearest upGrad offline center for customized recommendations and insights.

Expand your expertise with the best resources available. Browse the programs below to find your ideal fit in Best Machine Learning and AI Courses Online.

Best Machine Learning and AI Courses Online

Discover in-demand Machine Learning skills to expand your expertise. Explore the programs below to find the perfect fit for your goals.

In-demand Machine Learning Skills

Discover popular AI and ML blogs and free courses to deepen your expertise. Explore the programs below to find your perfect fit. 

Popular AI and ML Blogs & Free Courses

Reference Link:
https://www.crn.com/news/cloud/2025/top-5-largest-tech-markets-in-2025-gartner-s-5-6-trillion-forecast