1. Home
Docker

Understanding Docker: A Comprehensive Overview

Discover comprehensive Docker tutorials designed for all skill levels. Learn containerization, deployment, and best practices to enhance your development workflow.

  • 11
  • 4
right-top-arrow
11

Podman vs Docker: Which Container Tool is Right for You?

Updated on 02/09/2024438 Views

Introduction to Podman and Docker

Podman and Docker are two prominent systems that currently attract the attention of many in the tech industry. Docker is a US start-up company founded in 2013 that popularized the containerization process by offering an effective containerization tools platform. It has a strong and mature framework with great supporting tools and a large developer community. 

Overview of Podman

What is Podman?

Podman is a container management tool developed by Red Hat for creating pods in open-source environments. It is a container run-time built for lateral computing without relying on a host machine’s system daemon, which makes it different from Docker. Podman uses a Docker-compatible CLI, allowing users to perform commands for containers and image creation and manipulation. It makes it possible to support the Open Container Initiative (OCI) specification, which may work with numerous container tools and environments.

Key Features of Podman

  1. Daemonless Architecture: Another advantage of using Podman vs Docker is that it does not use a central daemon that is responsible for securing the overall environment and can be a source of failures due to its single points of failure.
  1. Rootless Mode: The article also highlighted another unique feature in Podman, which allows containers to be managed in a manner that prevents users from accessing and controlling files that they are not allowed to, thus making the container more secure for the application.
  1. Docker Compatibility: This is possible because the CLI commands in Podman are almost similar to those used with Docker. Therefore, transferring a command from one application to another is not a problem when using the other.
  1. Pod Management: It also recognizes the concept of the “pod,” which is what Kubernetes calls the concept of grouped containers that share the same storage and networking.
  1. OCI Compliance: Some of the main things I have learned from using Podman on container images include that it is affirmed to be compliant with the OCI image and runtime; this means that users have plenty of choices and manage their images.

Benefits of Using Podman

  1. Enhanced Security: The privileged mode and separate by store in settings modes of the Podman’s operation modes differ and prevent the Podman as a privileged daemon and root access.
  1. Flexibility: One of the significant features of Podman is that it has been developed to work with the Docker commands and General standards developed by the OCI, allowing this tool to work with commonly applied workflows and existing tools.
  1. Stability and Reliability: Since the daemon is specific only to running Podman and does not have a critical role in the system, Podman is more reliable.
  1. Kubernetes Native: Speaking about the managerial aspect of Podman it should be mentioned that the switch to Podman pod management is quite easy if the migration is made to Kubernetes systems.
  1. User-Friendly: Podman’s CLI is intentionally trimmed and referred to for specific features specific to every class of developers and the concerned system administrators.

Overview of Docker

What is Docker?

Docker can be regarded as a platform aimed at providing capabilities for containerizing applications and automating the process of their deployment and scaling. Founded in 2013, Docker uses containers to take action on applications independent of the host environment. Docker is an open-source environment that allows the deployment of applications and their dependencies into a standard format package, called a Docker container, that will work similarly across any computing environment from development to production.

Key Features of Docker

  1. Docker Engine: It is the core of the container, supporting its growth, delivery and resource control.
  1. Docker Hub: Docker Container Registry is a service for storing and sharing human-friendly package names based on images of container files.
  1. Docker Compose: A bash script to manage a distributed environment whose description has been described using the Docker Compose file.
  1. Docker Swarm: Docker Swarm is A Swiss army knife for docker that allows multiple docker engines to work as a single resource.
  1. Docker CLI: An application that is a wrapper over the Docker daemon and offers a CLI for running containerized applications, containerization, networking, and storage.

Advantages of Docker

  1. Portability: Docker operates on the concept of stand-alone isolation, which packages an application’s environment and all the resources, such as binaries and configuration files, in a tight unit so that everything behaves the same regardless of the environment.
  1. Efficiency: Pods can, therefore, be perceived as systems’ virtualization at the application level, and the individual “virtualization” units operate under the shared host’s kernel.
  1. Isolation: They can have a separate environment from other applications within a system, which may disrupt the running application.
  1. Speed: Less time will be needed for the containers' init and shutdown to better facilitate faster implementation of development, test cycles, and so forth.
  1. Ecosystem and Community: Docker is not a simple CLI; it also has several tools and services and an active community.

Difference Between Podman and Docker

This implies that both Podman vs Docker are platforms that facilitate the process of containerization which is the process of creating and running the application with all its dependencies as an enclosed entity. While they will be applied for similar performance, they are diverse in their structure, security and codes used, portability, compatibility, ecosystem support, and installation processes.

Security: Isolating Containers and Separating Daemon Processes.

  1. Podman:
  • Rootless Containers: A full overview of this feature is that it will improve security because a smaller area on each machine will be exposed to risk.
  • Daemonless Architecture: It is not necessarily centered around a central daemon, and therefore, no daemon can seize unauthorized access that could potentially threaten a system’s security.
  1. Docker:
  • Rootless Mode: Pods can run containers as a non-root user, a new feature compared to Podman.
  • Daemon-based Architecture: Dockerd is the central daemon of Docker and it deals with everything related to containers which can become a single point of failure and might threaten the security of the Docker platform.

Compatibility and Ecosystem Support

  1. Podman:
  • Compatibility: It supports different browser architectures and is also OCI compatible to ensure compatibility with other tools like containers.
  • Ecosystem Support: Pragmatic Scalability: Escalating Developer Adoption in Multiple Container-Friendly Platforms: Specifically Those with Security or Compliance Focus.
  1. Docker:
  • Compatibility: Algorand is well supported and has even had several cooperation services and platforms.
  • Ecosystem Support: The seductive and flexible design of the globe and generous support makes many deeply enamored by developers as well as businesses.

Installation and Setup Processes

Feature

Podman

Docker

Installation

Installable via package managers (dnf, apt, etc.)

Installable via package managers, Docker website

Setup

Simple setup, often with default configurations

Involves setting up the Docker daemon

Rootless Installation

Default, no additional configuration required

Requires specific setup steps for enabling rootless mode

Configuration Files

Individual container configurations, no central daemon

Centralized configuration through a daemon (docked)

System Requirements

Lightweight, minimal dependencies

Slightly heavier due to daemon requirements

Docker Desktop vs Podman

Overview of Docker Desktop

Podman vs Docker Desktop is a software developed specifically for macOS and Windows that allows users to interact with Docker tools, containers, and images in an interactive interface. It incorporates Docker Engine, Docker CLI, Docker Compose, Docker Content Trust, Kubernetes, and Credential Helper. Docker Desktop eases an individual’s work when transforming applications from development into production.

Key Features:

  1. New and improved Docker Engine and Docker CLI.
  1. Achieving orchestration with Docker Compose for multi-container apps.
  1. Container orchestration for container integration with Kubernetes.
  1. Power management and system configuration with graphical user interface.

Podman Overview on Desktop Environment

Podman is a double peculiarity because it does not use any daemon and is an open-source container engine. Podman is already supported by Linux distribution. However, it is also possible to set it up on macOS and Windows based on Windows Subsystem for Linux 2 (WSL2) solutions or Virtual Machines, respectively.

Key Features:

  1. Daemonless architecture
  1. Improving the security controls for managing rootless containers.
  1. Support from Docker CLI commands.

Performance and Resource Consumption

Aspect

Docker Desktop

Podman on Desktop

Resource Consumption

Higher due to the Docker daemon and additional services

Lower, no central daemon running

Performance

Slightly slower startup times due to daemon initialization

Faster startup times due to daemonless architecture

Memory Usage

Higher memory usage from Docker daemon and Kubernetes

With lower memory usage, containers run as individual processes, and lower memory usage is due to - the absence of a central daemon.

CPU Usage

Continuous CPU usage by the Docker daemon

Lower CPU usage: containers use CPU only when active

Docker vs Podman: Detailed Comparison

Architecture Differences

Aspect

Docker

Podman

Architecture

Daemon-based

Daemonless

Daemon

A centralized daemon (docked) manages all containers

No central daemon; each container is an independent process

Security

Requires elevated privileges (though rootless mode is available)

Designed for rootless operation from the start

Isolation

Containers managed by a single daemon

Containers run as individual processes, improving isolation and security

System Overhead

Higher due to the daemon running continuously

Lower as there is no central daemon

Final Thoughts

Podman vs Docker revealed that there are certain pros of using Podman, which are ideal for some users, while its counterparts are suitable for others. Docker, with its historical image and wide range of tooling, is still widely used for developing software and even enterprises deploying and scaling software where orchestration is important and software compatibility is necessary. 

It uses a daemon that’s typical for systems and CLI, which many users are familiar with, but it may be dangerous as it operates with root privileges. Although decision and risk are in the hands of Docker since it is more reliable than Podman, both tools are of equal importance as they provide effective management and deployment of container applications.

FAQs

1. Is Podman better than Docker?

Podman is useful for users who want to use containers without root-level privileges, and Podman is much more secure and safer than docker, whereas docker is useful for users who require containers to work with advanced orchestration.

2. Can Docker be replaced with Podman?

Yes, because Podman can seamlessly fill the shoes of Docker in almost all the ways it could but still focusing on security and rootless pods.

3. What are the disadvantages of Podman?

It does not have orchestrations like Docker Swarm, or at least not many at the moment, or it may have less help or support from the community.

4. Is Podman like Kubernetes?

We can say that they differ because Podman is a container engine and Kubernetes is a container orchestrator, but Podman can be used to render Kubernetes YAML.

5. Why replace Docker with Podman?

From the cost reduction and security perspective Podman from Docker is to use rootless containers plus eliminate the daemonic process in the centralized process.

6. Why choose Podman over Docker?

Red Hat Podman provides the user with improved protection options and means for operating in rootless mode and using its daemonless design.

7. Is Podman slower than Docker?

They offer the same performance level, and performance changes slightly based on use and environment.

8. Is Podman 100% compatible with Docker?

Podman can also be compared to Docker in that it supports images, translation and CLI commands in similar ways.

9. Is Podman free or paid?

It works fine as the Podman is not at all proprietary and Podman is 100% free and open-source.

Mukesh Kumar

Mukesh Kumar

Working with upGrad as a Senior Engineering Manager with more than 10+ years of experience in Software Development and Product Management.

Talk to Career Expert
form image
+91
*
By clicking, I accept theT&Cand
Privacy Policy
image
Join 10M+ Learners & Transform Your Career
Learn on a personalised AI-powered platform that offers best-in-class content, live sessions & mentorship from leading industry experts.
right-top-arrowleft-top-arrow

upGrad Learner Support

Talk to our experts. We’re available 24/7.

text

Indian Nationals

1800 210 2020

text

Foreign Nationals

+918045604032

Disclaimer

upGrad does not grant credit; credits are granted, accepted or transferred at the sole discretion of the relevant educational institution offering the diploma or degree. We advise you to enquire further regarding the suitability of this program for your academic, professional requirements and job prospects before enr...