For working professionals
For fresh graduates
More
5. Docker Hub
7. Docker Swarm
9. Docker Image
10. Docker Registry
11. Podman vs Docker
Podman and Docker are two prominent systems that currently attract the attention of many in the tech industry. Docker is a US start-up company founded in 2013 that popularized the containerization process by offering an effective containerization tools platform. It has a strong and mature framework with great supporting tools and a large developer community.
Podman is a container management tool developed by Red Hat for creating pods in open-source environments. It is a container run-time built for lateral computing without relying on a host machine’s system daemon, which makes it different from Docker. Podman uses a Docker-compatible CLI, allowing users to perform commands for containers and image creation and manipulation. It makes it possible to support the Open Container Initiative (OCI) specification, which may work with numerous container tools and environments.
Docker can be regarded as a platform aimed at providing capabilities for containerizing applications and automating the process of their deployment and scaling. Founded in 2013, Docker uses containers to take action on applications independent of the host environment. Docker is an open-source environment that allows the deployment of applications and their dependencies into a standard format package, called a Docker container, that will work similarly across any computing environment from development to production.
This implies that both Podman vs Docker are platforms that facilitate the process of containerization which is the process of creating and running the application with all its dependencies as an enclosed entity. While they will be applied for similar performance, they are diverse in their structure, security and codes used, portability, compatibility, ecosystem support, and installation processes.
Feature | Podman | Docker |
Installation | Installable via package managers (dnf, apt, etc.) | Installable via package managers, Docker website |
Setup | Simple setup, often with default configurations | Involves setting up the Docker daemon |
Rootless Installation | Default, no additional configuration required | Requires specific setup steps for enabling rootless mode |
Configuration Files | Individual container configurations, no central daemon | Centralized configuration through a daemon (docked) |
System Requirements | Lightweight, minimal dependencies | Slightly heavier due to daemon requirements |
Podman vs Docker Desktop is a software developed specifically for macOS and Windows that allows users to interact with Docker tools, containers, and images in an interactive interface. It incorporates Docker Engine, Docker CLI, Docker Compose, Docker Content Trust, Kubernetes, and Credential Helper. Docker Desktop eases an individual’s work when transforming applications from development into production.
Key Features:
Podman is a double peculiarity because it does not use any daemon and is an open-source container engine. Podman is already supported by Linux distribution. However, it is also possible to set it up on macOS and Windows based on Windows Subsystem for Linux 2 (WSL2) solutions or Virtual Machines, respectively.
Key Features:
Aspect | Docker Desktop | Podman on Desktop |
Resource Consumption | Higher due to the Docker daemon and additional services | Lower, no central daemon running |
Performance | Slightly slower startup times due to daemon initialization | Faster startup times due to daemonless architecture |
Memory Usage | Higher memory usage from Docker daemon and Kubernetes | With lower memory usage, containers run as individual processes, and lower memory usage is due to - the absence of a central daemon. |
CPU Usage | Continuous CPU usage by the Docker daemon | Lower CPU usage: containers use CPU only when active |
Aspect | Docker | Podman |
Architecture | Daemon-based | Daemonless |
Daemon | A centralized daemon (docked) manages all containers | No central daemon; each container is an independent process |
Security | Requires elevated privileges (though rootless mode is available) | Designed for rootless operation from the start |
Isolation | Containers managed by a single daemon | Containers run as individual processes, improving isolation and security |
System Overhead | Higher due to the daemon running continuously | Lower as there is no central daemon |
Podman vs Docker revealed that there are certain pros of using Podman, which are ideal for some users, while its counterparts are suitable for others. Docker, with its historical image and wide range of tooling, is still widely used for developing software and even enterprises deploying and scaling software where orchestration is important and software compatibility is necessary.
It uses a daemon that’s typical for systems and CLI, which many users are familiar with, but it may be dangerous as it operates with root privileges. Although decision and risk are in the hands of Docker since it is more reliable than Podman, both tools are of equal importance as they provide effective management and deployment of container applications.
1. Is Podman better than Docker?
Podman is useful for users who want to use containers without root-level privileges, and Podman is much more secure and safer than docker, whereas docker is useful for users who require containers to work with advanced orchestration.
2. Can Docker be replaced with Podman?
Yes, because Podman can seamlessly fill the shoes of Docker in almost all the ways it could but still focusing on security and rootless pods.
3. What are the disadvantages of Podman?
It does not have orchestrations like Docker Swarm, or at least not many at the moment, or it may have less help or support from the community.
4. Is Podman like Kubernetes?
We can say that they differ because Podman is a container engine and Kubernetes is a container orchestrator, but Podman can be used to render Kubernetes YAML.
5. Why replace Docker with Podman?
From the cost reduction and security perspective Podman from Docker is to use rootless containers plus eliminate the daemonic process in the centralized process.
6. Why choose Podman over Docker?
Red Hat Podman provides the user with improved protection options and means for operating in rootless mode and using its daemonless design.
7. Is Podman slower than Docker?
They offer the same performance level, and performance changes slightly based on use and environment.
8. Is Podman 100% compatible with Docker?
Podman can also be compared to Docker in that it supports images, translation and CLI commands in similar ways.
9. Is Podman free or paid?
It works fine as the Podman is not at all proprietary and Podman is 100% free and open-source.
Author
Talk to our experts. We are available 7 days a week, 9 AM to 12 AM (midnight)
Indian Nationals
1800 210 2020
Foreign Nationals
+918045604032
1.The above statistics depend on various factors and individual results may vary. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
2.The student assumes full responsibility for all expenses associated with visas, travel, & related costs. upGrad does not provide any a.